Compliance News | October 17, 2022
On October 14, 2022, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) published its proposed rule on withdrawal liability assumptions in the Federal Register. The proposed rule provides an acceptable range of interest rates, which includes the Segal Blend, that may be used to calculate an employer’s withdrawal liability.
Recent court decisions have called into question the use of an interest rate assumption used to determine withdrawal liability that is not based on anticipated investment returns. The direct and indirect results of these decisions are lower withdrawal liability payments, either due to lower withdrawal liability assessments or settlements for less than the full amount given the risk of litigation. Receiving lower withdrawal liability payments from a withdrawn employer shifts liabilities to remaining employers and puts the plan participants at risk in the event the plan is not able to pay full accrued benefits. To help reduce or eliminate this cost-shifting, the PBGC is exercising its authority to prescribe actuarial assumptions for determining withdrawal liability.
According to PBGC Director Gordon Hartogensis, the “proposed rule provides the clarity that many multiemployer plans need to determine an employer’s withdrawal liability and [to] protect the retirement security of the workers and retirees covered by the plan.” The PBGC expects that the proposed rule will have an overall positive effect on the multiemployer system and the PBGC’s multiemployer program.
Under ERISA, a withdrawn employer may be assessed withdrawal liability, which is the employer’s allocable share of the plan’s unfunded vested benefits, determined on the basis of:
Until now, the PBGC had not issued such regulations.
The proposed rule provides acceptable interest rates that range from PBGC annuity rates (the rates set forth in existing PBGC regulations, reflecting the market price of purchasing annuities from private insurers) to the rate selected by the plan’s actuary for ERISA minimum funding purposes.
In general, any approach that blends PBGC annuity rates and the minimum funding rates, such as the Segal Blend, falls within the range and is acceptable.
Other assumptions also are required to calculate withdrawal liability. Under the proposed rule, methods and assumptions (other than the interest rate assumption) must still be reasonable (taking into account the experience of the plan and expectations) and, in combination, reflect the actuary’s best estimate of anticipated experience under the plan.
Comments on the proposed rule are due to the PBGC no later than November 14, 2022. The PBGC specifically requested comments on whether the final rule should restrict acceptable interest rates to a narrower range or to specific methodologies for determining rates. It also requested comments on whether the final rule should specify other assumptions or methods in addition to the interest rate and invites comments on other issues related to withdrawal liability assumptions.
The proposed rule would apply to a determination of withdrawal liability for withdrawals that occur on or after the effective date of the final rule. However, “the proposed rule does not preclude the use of an interest rate assumption described [in the proposed rule] to determine unfunded vested benefits before the effective date of the final rule.”
This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, tax or investment advice. You are encouraged to discuss the issues raised here with your legal, tax and other advisors before determining how the issues apply to your specific situations.
Don't miss out. Join 16,000 others who already get the latest insights from Segal.