Compliance News | October 26, 2026

PBGC Seeks to Expand SFA Reporting

The PBGC is planning to expand the information that multiemployer pension plans receiving Special Financial Assistance (SFA) must provide as part of the Annual Statement of Compliance (ASOC) that must be filed every year through 2051.

The proposal only affects multiemployer plans that have received or will receive SFA (SFA plans).

PBGC Seeks to Expand SFA Reporting

The PBGC invites comments on the proposal. The comment deadline is December 15, 2026.

Background on current SFA reporting requirements

The PBGC’s ASOC instructions currently require SFA plans to file certain documents with the ASOC, including:

  • Audited financial statements
  • Actuarial valuation reports
  • Account statements showing that SFA funds are kept separate
  • Investment and custodian statements
  • SFA investment allocation worksheets
  • Zone certifications
  • Updated cash-flow projections

We discussed the ASOC in our August 9, 2022 webinar, “SFA: Solvency Through 2051?” We also mentioned reporting requirements in our June 5, 2024 downloadable resource, “Your Plan Has Received SFA. What Happens Now?”

The proposal to require additional items

The PBGC’s proposal, which was published in the October 16, 2026 Federal Register, would revise instructions to the ASOC to add the following:

  • Investment governance documents. SFA plans would be required to provide the most recent investment policy statement, investment guidelines, asset allocation policy, investment committee charter or any similar governing document. This covers documents used for all plan assets, including SFA assets.
  • Trustee and committee minutes. Minutes of meetings where the trustees or a fiduciary committee discussed investment policy or investment-related service providers would have to be provided. Any investment reports reviewed at those meetings would also be required.

    SFA plans would be allowed to submit excerpts and redact privileged material, personally identifiable information and unrelated content.

    The submission must still show the meeting date, which fiduciary body met, the materials reviewed and any investment actions or votes. If no responsive meetings, minutes or written policies exist, the SFA plan would have to attach a statement saying so.

  • Missing participants. The plan would have to provide data on missing participants as well as documentation of its procedures for finding them. “Missing participants” includes people with inaccurate or incomplete contact or census information, and people whose mail or email is returned as undeliverable.
  • Criminal violations. The PBGC’s proposal would revise the wording for the question that asks whether any criminal violations affecting the plan have occurred.

Timeline for compliance

The proposal in the form of a Federal Register notice advises the public that the PBGC is requesting that the Office of Management Budget (OMB) approve the PBGC increasing the information that is currently required by the instructions to the ASOC.

The existing OMB approval for the PBGC’s collection of information expires on May 31, 2027. The PBGC’s proposal seeks that OMB extend the approval of the instructions (with the modifications) for the maximum permitted three-year extension.

Until OMB approves the modifications, the current ASOC instructions remain in effect, and the additional items are not required. The Federal Register notice does not indicate to which plan year the additional items would apply.

Have questions about this PBGC proposal?

We have answers.

Get in Touch

See more insights

Multi Ethnic Group Of Businesspeople Collaborating In The Office

Why Now Is a Great Time for Pension Plan De-Risking

See how funding objectives, plan maturity, cash flows and ALM studies can guide pension plan sponsors toward the right de-risking strategy.
Collaborative Teamwork In A Modern Office

Multiemployer Pension Plan News for Q3 2026

See Q3 2026 multiemployer pension plan trends: zone status, SFA, Federal Reserve developments, AI insights and compliance updates.
Two Ironworkers On Construction Platform With Blueprints

Court Clarifies Withdrawal Liability Construction Exception

A ruling finds a cumulative headcount method better reflects workforce composition when applying the construction exception to withdrawal liability.

This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, tax or investment advice. You are encouraged to discuss the issues raised here with your legal, tax and other advisors before determining how the issues apply to your specific situations.