Compliance News | February 27, 2020

SCOTUS: Receipt of DC Plan Disclosure Not “Actual Knowledge”

Yesterday, in the Intel v. Sulyma case, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously in the participant’s favor, finding that a participant does not necessarily have “actual knowledge” of the information contained in DC plan investment disclosures that the participant received but does not read or cannot recall reading.

G Review Docs 1092087526 Web

Questions about the topic?

We're here to help. Get in touch. 

Speak with Us

Brief background

Whether a participant has “actual knowledge” of information in DC plan investment disclosures determines the time period in which they can sue under ERISA with respect to an allegedly imprudent plan investment. The ERISA statute of limitations is generally six years, but it is shortened to three years if the participant has actual knowledge of the alleged violation.

The case

In this case, the participant sued Intel in 2015 in connection with plan investments made between 2010 and 2012 in hedge funds and private equity. Intel argued that the claim was “time barred” because the participant properly received disclosures relating to these investments more than three years before he filed his lawsuit.

While the parties agreed that Intel sent the disclosures in a timely manner, the participant said he did not recall having read them. The Unites States District Court, Northern District of California agreed with Intel that the claim was time barred, but the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed that decision on the basis that the participant did not have actual knowledge because he said he did not recall reading the disclosures — and, therefore, the general six-year statute of limitation applies. The Supreme Court affirmed the Ninth Circuit’s decision.

Implications

This ruling could have significant implications for the content and/or distribution process of plan investment-related disclosures. Segal will be sharing a more detailed summary of the decision in the near future.

Stressed Man

Timeline for Transparency Laws and Surprise Medical Billing

This chart compiles all recent laws and rules concerning healthcare price transparency as of December 30, 2020.
Senior Couple Moving

New DOL Guidance on Missing Participants in Retirement Plans

Learn more about the missing-participant searches guidance and how it might affect your plans.
Man Reading Documents

New Law Strengthens Parity for Mental Health and SUD

Learn more about the new parity requirements and see what actions you need to take regarding your health plans.

This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, tax or investment advice. You are encouraged to discuss the issues raised here with your legal, tax and other advisors before determining how the issues apply to your specific situations.

Don't miss out. Join 16,000 others who already get the latest insights from Segal.